A few hours ago, DAX Studio 2.5.0 has been released, with a number of small new features (I will write about DirectQuery and new column in Server Timings in a future blog post and article). In the many bug fixes, this version of DAX Studio does not raise an error when multiple EVALUATE statements are executed within the same Run operation. This could be particularly useful when you analyze the DAX queries generated by Power BI, which optimize the roundtrip between client and server by using exactly this technique. However, DAX Studio still doesn’t have a full support, but it’s good enough to start an analysis. Let’s see in details the current situation:
- Results: only the rows returned by the first EVALUATE are displayed in the Results pane. Currently, DAX Studio ignores the following resultsets, which are executed on the server and transferred to the client, but not displayed.
- Query Plan: the logical query plan contains all the operation of all the EVALUATE statements. However, the physical query plan only displays the operations executed for the first statement, ignoring the physical query plans of following EVALUATE statements.
- Server Timings: all the storage engine events of all the statements are displayed and computed. Thus, if you consider the set of EVALUATE statements as a single operation, the Server Timings does exactly the right thing. However, you cannot easily split the time spent for each EVALUATE statement.
The plan for future improvements is to align Query Plan behavior to Server Timings, showing all the operations of all the EVALUATE statements. For Results pane, we have to find a way to display other resultsets in an efficient way (feedback is welcome – I don’t like the idea of creating a pane for each result).
Looking at this issue, I also found an answer to a problem that I’ve found discussing with Chris Webb one week ago commenting his post Defining Variables in DAX Queries. The question was why you should use the VAR syntax before EVALUATE? For example, why you should use the first syntax instead of the second one?
The reason is now clear to me: when you want to share the same variable in multiple EVALUATE statements, the former syntax guarantees a single definition and evaluation!
I know, these details are interesting only if you are writing a DAX client and you are not in the Power BI team (they already use this technique) – in this case, write your comments below, I’d like to know who is working on these tools!