The 2015 has been an amazing year for Power BI. One year ago, I was commenting on this blog the public preview of Power BI dashboards. A few days ago, Microsoft released the December update of Power BI Desktop and several updates of the Power BI service. In one year, we moved from a situation where Microsoft seemed (and actually was) too slow in the BI market, to a weekly (and sometimes daily) wave of announcements that are becoming hard to follow also for those enthusiast early adopters (but don’t misunderstand and read my lips: D O N ‘ T   S T O P   R E L E A S I N G   N E W   F E A T U R E S !!).

It’s clear that Microsoft is moving quickly to get the cloud market of BI services, which is still unexplored (after all, most of the companies keep their data on premises), but it is the only player providing a credible story of integration between cloud and on premises BI services (see “The Box is Back” and “Happy Together” pictures used at last PASS Summit). I finally see both strategy and execution working together. And execution is happening at the right speed, which has to be very fast nowadays.

There are a long number of features, improvements, technical details, and future directions that justify this analysis, but there is still a long road ahead before good comments become actual revenues and adoption in production. However, there are key changes I have seen in this year that strongly support a positive outlook for the entire Microsoft BI stack of technologies:

  • No more “by design” answer: first and foremost, the entire Microsoft BI team removed the “by design” answer for bug/suggestions submissions. The Power Query team started with this positive attitude of considering feedback as something to use for real. Now the entire Microsoft BI team listen to the community, consider feedback and prioritize features based on comments received. Don’t underestimate this point. This, and an increased transparency, is the foundation of the credibility that leverages the word of mouth and community support. Other Microsoft products don’t have this asset, and they should do something to get it. Microsoft is behaving as a startup here, and the results are visible. One year ago, this was a promise. Today, it is a fact.
  • Constant and continuous innovation: weekly and monthly releases creates a push to keep the software up-to-date. This impacts in particular Power BI Desktop, and backwards compatibility is no longer a constraint for innovation. There are pros and cons in this, but by now there are more goods than bads.
  • DataZen acquisition: I’ve seen many comments that were not convinced about this move, because it was creating confusion and overlaps with other Microsoft products. Now that Microsoft released SQL Server 2016 CTP 3.2 that includes the first version of DataZen (now named “mobile report type”) in Reporting Services, most of these considerations are over. However, I always thought that DataZen acquisition was an excellent strategic move. Microsoft bought a fast-growing company that was not quoted, including the technology and the development team in a single move. While most of the comments were about the effective value of the technology and the overlap between DataZen and Power BI mobile app, my appreciation was more about buying a company to remove it from the market, so that other possible big competitors wouldn’t have been a chance to buy it. Doing that when the company was mature enough to have a real customer base (and a real working product), but small enough to not be under the radar of many analysts, is an additional bonus. Great move.
  • Custom visuals in Power BI: disclaimer: I might be biased for having inspired the creation of Synoptic Panel. But I think that making the visual components an open source part of Power BI and enabling a large community to contribute to a public gallery is a super smart move. If the community contributes, this is good. But even in case the community would not respond, Microsoft opens a door to release part of software complementing its product (Power BI), without requiring the cost related to official release of software (which higher costs are internationalization and documentation). Think about the cost of releasing and supporting software in hundreds of languages (think to Office) and you should quickly realize why this move is smart. Not to mention the number of opportunities that it opens to Microsoft partner, leveraging the existing ecosystem.
  • Adoption or “R”: Is the support of the “R” language really required for a tool like Power BI? Let me say an unpopular opinion: there are too many buzzwords in the BI arena, and it’s not the first time. It has been always the same, just changing the buzzwords. We started with DSS (Decision Support Systems), we recently heard about big data, I’ve seen that BA (business analytics) rocks more than BI (business intelligence), you cannot live without a data scientist, and yes, you need “R” in your company. The list could continue for pages. But is this really true? I am convinced that “R” is very good in certain domains, and at the same time I see it used (or even just considered) also when it is completely useless. But I am a consultant, I don’t sell licenses, I help customers building solutions that actually work, possibly reducing development cost and time. “R” is an option, but is not necessarily important or relevant in many scenarios. But can Microsoft ignore the important of buzzwords and trends in the market? Absolutely no. So adopting “R” for data sources and visualizations (see latest announcement for R Visuals in Power BI) is another great move that will help Microsoft sales (and this is true for all Microsoft partners, too).

I have seen in one year a multiple of what I have seen in the previous ten years. In reality, Microsoft is leveraging many assets that were already in-house (the Tabular engine, Power Pivot, Power Query, Power View, and many other Azure’s based services), which development required several years. But the weak point has always been the “last mile” of data visualization and presentation. Other players were years-ahead in this area. And I think they are still ahead of Microsoft. You might have a scenario that already fits well with Power BI. Maybe your scenario will be “Power BI” friendly in a few months. But the trend is clear and the improvement is continuous. So, when I think to the considerations I will do in 12 months, I am very positive and I am also scared about the number of new features I have to learn. Since this is what I (probably we) asked for many years, I cannot complain!

I always take a look at stock price of companies to check whether financial results and expected outcomes correspond to my point of view. Unfortunately, it’s not fair to compare Microsoft with other specialized companies that work only in the BI market. So we cannot draw any conclusion by observing that Microsoft (MSFT) is at its highest point since Tableau IPO (DATA), whereas Qlik (QLIK) didn’t add much value to stockholders in the last 3 years (source: MSFT).


What can we expect in 2016? I expect Power BI to continue its growing as data visualization platform, ecosystem, and adoption. However, the upcoming Microsoft SQL Server 2016 will be a huge release for the BI services. It will be the more important release since 2005, and this is mainly because of the new SQL Server Reporting Services (see Microsoft Business Intelligence reporting roadmap to read more). In reality, also SQL Server Analysis Services is a very important release, being the first major upgrade since SQL Server 2012 for Analysis Services Tabular (see latest announcements for SQL Server 2016 Analysis Services CTP 3.2).

Without going in detail, there are many new features that will make Tabular a more “enterprise ready” platform. It’s not that the current version is not good, I helped many companies in successful adoption of Tabular, but there are many improvements in productivity and performance that completely justify the upgrade even before considering new features available in the new version. There will be a lot to write about that, and I really look forward to start doing that in a few weeks.

The magic key will be “Hybrid BI”. It’s already happening. I expect most if not all of the companies to move in an “hybrid” area for their BI solutions, where certain part are implemented on premises, and others in the cloud. And the reason to move on premises is not always preserving legacy investment, it could be requiring top performance of hardware for in-memory databases. For a certain size, you need to do an accurate hardware choice, where spending more is not necessarily better. In the very long term, I expect everything to move to the cloud, but the reality is that the two technologies will live together for a very long time, and Power BI is a good candidate to play a major role in this scenario.